
The
Corporation DVD
The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and
Power
One hundred and fifty
years ago, the corporation was a relatively insignificant
entity. Today it is a vivid, dramatic and pervasive
presence in all our lives.
THE CORPORATION explores
the nature and spectacular rise of the dominant
institution of our time.
Footage from pop culture, advertising, TV news
and corporate propaganda illuminates the corporation’s
grip on our lives. Taking its legal status as
a “person” to its logical conclusion,
the film puts the corporation on the psychiatrist’s
couch to ask “What kind of person is it?” Provoking,
witty, sweepingly informative, the Corporation
includes forty interviews with corporate insiders
and critics - including Milton Friedman, Noam
Chomsky, Naomi Klein and Michael Moore - plus
true confessions, case studies and strategies
for change.
Winner of 24 INTERNATIONAL
AWARDS, 10 of them
AUDIENCE CHOICE AWARDS including the AUDIENCE
AWARD for DOCUMENTARY in WORLD CINEMA at the
2004 SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL. This long-awaited
DVD contains over 8 hour of additional footage.
The film is based on the book The
Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit
and Power by Joel Bakan.
"Jaw
dropping"
Margaret
Pomeranz - ABC At The Movies (4 stars)
"THE
CORPORATION is a riveting, entertaining,
and highly intelligent film that is sure
to provoke heated discussion about a
long-neglected but vital question: the
proper role of business in society."
Rosabeth
Moss Kanter, Author of Confidence: How
Winning Streaks And Losing Streaks Begin and
End; Professor, Harvard Business School
"Absolutely
riveting … amazing revelations … truly
disturbing and fascinating"
David
Stratton - ABC At The Movies (4 stars)
"Superbly
crafted … spellbinding. This should
be compulsory viewing for every single
person on the planet."
Jaimie
Leonarder, The Movie Show (5 stars)
"Drag
an apathetic or apolitical friend to
see it with you - they may never be the
same again!"
4-star
review, in NI magazine,
July 2004 (NI
369)
Format:
DVD in PAL format, region code 0 (all
regions)
Duration: 145 minutes plus extra footage
Age Group Suitability: upper primary
to adult
PAL
format
This movie is in PAL format
and is not suitable for use in France, Japan,
Canada, USA and Mexico unless
a multi-system player is used (since these
countries use NTSC format,
not PAL).
For more information on multi-system players
visit http://www.dvdoverseas.com and
to check what system your country uses visit
http://www.dvdoverseas.com/world_broadcasting.htm
Region
Codes
DVDs contain region codes which denote the
areas in the world in which they can be
played. Code 0 means that DVDs can be
played in all regions. For further information
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD_region_code |
THE DVD
Along with the groundbreaking 145-minute theatrical
version of the film, the two-disc set has eight
hours of never-before-seen footage. All of
your favourite heroes and villains are back.
In addition to two commentary tracks, deleted
scenes, Q's and A's, additional languages and
descriptive audio for the visually impaired,
165 never seen before clips and updates are
sorted "by person" AND "by topic." Get
the details you want to know on the issues
you care about. Then, check out the web links
for follow-up research and action.
THE CORPORATION - DETAILED SYNOPSIS
In THE CORPORATION, case studies, anecdotes and
true confessions reveal behind-the-scenes tensions
and influences in several corporate and anti-corporate
dramas. Each illuminates an aspect of the corporation's
complex character.
Among the 40 interview subjects are CEOs and
top-level executives from a range of industries:
oil, pharmaceutical, computer, tire, manufacturing,
public relations, branding, advertising and undercover
marketing; in addition, a Nobel-prize winning
economist, the first management guru, a corporate
spy, and a range of academics, critics, historians
and thinkers are interviewed.
A LEGAL "PERSON"
In the mid-1800s the corporation emerged as a
legal "person." Imbued with a "personality" of
pure self-interest, the next 100 years saw
the corporation's rise to dominance. The corporation
created unprecedented wealth. But at what cost?
The remorseless rationale of "externalities"—as
Milton Friedman explains: the unintended consequences
of a transaction between two parties on a third—is
responsible for countless cases of illness,
death, poverty, pollution, exploitation and
lies.
THE PATHOLOGY OF COMMERCE: CASE HISTORIES
To more precisely assess the "personality" of
the corporate "person," a checklist
is employed, using actual diagnostic criteria
of the World Health Organization and the DSM-IV,
the standard diagnostic tool of psychiatrists
and psychologists. The operational principles
of the corporation give it a highly anti-social "personality":
It is self-interested, inherently amoral, callous
and deceitful; it breaches social and legal standards
to get its way; it does not suffer from guilt,
yet it can mimic the human qualities of empathy,
caring and altruism. Four case studies, drawn
from a universe of corporate activity, clearly
demonstrate harm to workers, human health, animals
and the biosphere. Concluding this point-by-point
analysis, a disturbing diagnosis is delivered:
the institutional embodiment of laissez-faire
capitalism fully meets the diagnostic criteria
of a "psychopath."
MINDSET
But what is the ethical mindset of corporate
players? Should the institution or the individuals
within it be held responsible?
The people who work for corporations
may be good people, upstanding citizens in
their communities
- but none of that matters when they enter the
corporation's world. As Sam Gibara, Former CEO
and Chairman of Goodyear Tire, explains, "If
you really had a free hand, if you really did
what you wanted to do that suited your personal
thoughts and your personal priorities, you'd
act differently."
Ray Anderson, CEO of Interface, the world's
largest commercial carpet manufacturer, had an
environmental epiphany and re-organized his $1.4
billion company on sustainable principles. His
company may be a beacon of corporate hope, but
is it an exception to the rule?
MONSTROUS OBLIGATIONS
A case in point: Sir Mark Moody-Stuart recounts
an exchange between himself (at the time Chairman
of Royal Dutch Shell), his wife, and a motley
crew of Earth First activists who arrived on
the doorstep of their country home. The protesters
chanted and stretched a banner over their roof
that read, "MURDERERS." The response
of the surprised couple was not to call the
police, but to engage their uninvited guests
in a civil dialogue, share concerns about human
rights and the environment and eventually serve
them tea on their front lawn. Yet, as the Moody-Stuarts
apologize for not being able to provide soy
milk for their vegan critics' tea, Shell Nigeria
is flaring unrivaled amounts of gas, making
it one of the world's single worst sources
of pollution. And all the professed concerns
about the environment do not spare Ken Saro
Wiwa and eight other activists from being hanged
for opposing Shell's environmental practices
in the Niger Delta.
The Corporation exists to
create wealth, and even world disasters can
be profit centers. Carlton
Brown, a commodities trader, recounts with unabashed
honesty the mindset of gold traders while the
twin towers crushed their occupants. The first
thing that came to their minds, he tells us,
was: "How much is gold up?"
PLANET INC.
You'd think that things like disasters, or the
purity of childhood, or even milk, let alone
water or air, would be sacred. But no. Corporations
have no built-in limits on what, who, or how
much they can exploit for profit. In the fifteenth
century, the enclosure movement began to put
fences around public grazing lands so that
they might be privately owned and exploited.
Today, every molecule on the planet is up for
grabs. In a bid to own it all, corporations
are patenting animals, plants, even your DNA.
Around things too precious, vulnerable, sacred
or important to the public interest, governments
have, in the past, drawn protective boundaries
against corporate exploitation. Today, governments
are inviting corporations into domains from which
they were previously barred.
PERCEPTION MANAGEMENT
The Initiative Corporation spends $22 billion
worldwide placing its clients' advertising
in every imaginable - and some unimaginable
- media. One new medium: very young children.
Their "Nag Factor" study dropped
jaws in the world of child psychiatry. It was
designed not to help parents cope with their
children's nagging, but to help corporations
formulate their ads and promotions so that
children would nag for their products more
effectively. Initiative Vice President Lucy
Hughes elaborates: "You can manipulate
consumers into wanting, and therefore buying
your products. It's a game."
Today people can become brands
(Martha Stewart). And brands can build cities
(Celebration, Florida).
And university students can pay for their educations
by shilling on national television for a credit
card company (Chris and Luke). And a corporation
even owns the rights to the popular song "Happy
Birthday" (a division of AOL-Time-Warner).
Do you ever get the feeling it's all a bit much?
Corporations have invested billions to shape
public and political opinion. When they own everything,
who will stand for the public good?
THE PRICE OF WHISTLEBLOWING
It turns out that standing for the public good
is an expensive proposition. Ask Jane Akre
and Steve Wilson, two investigative reporters
fired by Fox News after they refused to water
down a story on rBGH, a controversial synthetic
hormone widely used in the United States (but
banned in Europe and Canada) to rev up cows'
metabolism and boost their milk production.
Because of the increased production, the cows
suffer from mastitis, a painful infection of
the udders. Antibiotics must then be injected,
which find their way into the milk, and ultimately
reduce people's resistance to disease.
Fox demanded that they rewrite the story, and
ultimately fired Akre and Wilson. Akre and Wilson
subsequently sued Fox under Florida's whistle-blower
statute. They proved to a jury that the version
of the story Fox would have had them put on the
air was false, distorted or slanted. Akre was
awarded $425,000. Then Fox appealed, the verdict
was overturned on a technicality, and Akre lost
her award. [For an update on the case see Disc
2 where we learn that at one point, Jane and
Steve became liable for Fox's $1.8 million court
costs, later to be reduced to $200,000.]
DEMOCRACY LTD.
Democracy is a value that the corporation just
doesn't understand. In fact, corporations have
often tried to undo democracy if it is an obstacle
to their single-minded drive for profit. From
a 1934 business-backed plot to install a military
dictator in the White House (undone by the
integrity of one U.S. Marine Corps General,
Smedley Darlington Butler) to present-day law-drafting,
corporations have bought military might, political
muscle and public opinion.
And corporations do not hesitate
to take advantage of democracy's absence either.
One of the most
shocking stories of the twentieth century is
Edwin Black's recounting IBM's strategic alliance
with Nazi Germany—one that began in 1933
in the first weeks that Hitler came to power
and continued well into World War II.
FISSURES
The corporation may be trying to render governments
impotent, but since the landmark WTO protest
in Seattle, a rising wave of networked individuals
and groups have decided to make their voices
heard. Movements to challenge the very foundations
of the corporation are afoot: The corporate
charter revocation movement tried to bring
down oil giant Unocal; a groundbreaking ballot
initiative in Arcata, California, put the corporate
agenda in the public spotlight in a series
of town hall meetings; in Bolivia, the population
fought and won a battle against a huge transnational
corporation brought in by their government
to privatize the water system; in India nearly
99% of the basmati patent of RiceTek was overturned;
and W. R. Grace and the U.S. government's patent
on Neem was revoked.
As global individuals take back local power,
a growing re-invigoration of the concept of citizenship
is taking root. It has the power to not only
strip the corporation of its seeming omnipotence,
but to create a feeling and an ideology of democracy
that is much more than its mere institutional
version.
|